Governor Brown Appoints New WCAB Chair

Governor Brown, who I still salute, despite his other faults, for the workers’ compensation bills he signs into law as much as those that he vetoes, has seen fit to appoint a new chairman of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board.  At press time, the Department of Industrial Relations website still showed the chairman as Joseph M. Miller, but according to the governor’s website, Commissioner Ronnie G. Caplane is to take over as chairman of the WCAB.

Chairman Miller was appointed by the former governor in 2005.

In that hope springs eternal, your momentarily optimistic blogger wishes the new chairman the best of luck in guiding the WCAB to just and sound decisions.  We all know that California’s Workers’ Compensation system certainly needs them.

The Real WC Frauds of Orange County

Think back to all the lessons you learned when you had your own lemonade stand, and apply them to the following business model.  Step 1) defraud the State of California to the tune of $30 million; Step 2) get caught; Step 3) pay back a few million, give up $500,000 in jewels, plea to 10 years of probation; Step 4) Profit!

This is the approach taken by Devon Lynn Kile, who recently was convicted of running one of the larger California workers’ compensation fraud schemes, at least according to a few news sources, including ClaimsJournal and OCWeekly.

Kile, who, coincidentally, had previously applied to be one of the “Real Housewives of Orange County“, was convicted of 72 felony counts of variations of fraud, including the under-reporting of income and payroll.  As part of her plea deal, she will pay back $1.3 million to Employment Development Department, $1.5 million to the Franchise Tax Board, and some amount not yet determined to State Compensation Insurance Fund.

Kile was sentenced to ten years in prison, suspended for 10 years of probation.  If she is a model citizen, living off whatever remains of her ill-gotten goods, she will escape justice.

All-in-all, a profitable venture – your disappointed blogger applauds the Orange County District Attorney’s office for its investigation and prosecution of this case, but would have liked to see all the money returned before serving actual prison time was taken off the table.

Use of MPNs Over 75%

A new study from the California Workers’ Compensation Institute confirms that the use of medical provider networks is at an all-time high.  (Unable to resist making a sarcastic remark, your humble blogger will note that an unrelated study recently confirmed that water is wet, fire is hot, and businesses prefer taking advantage of favorable laws rather than tossing bags of money into a bottomless medical-industry pit.)

The study reviewed medical visit data from over one million claims with a date of injury from 2004 to late 2010, and evaluated whether those visits were to MPN doctors.  Since MPNs became available to insurance companies and self-insured employers and groups, the number has grown drastically, such that MPNs “accounted for more than 75 percent of all first-year, physician-based outpatient services rendered on” 2009 date-of-injury claims.

It is no closely-held secret that I am a big fan of MPNs.  They protect the employee from prescription-happy fraudsters, and they provide some defense against nutty professors for the employers.  But the greatest indication that MPNs work is found in studies like these – employers and insurance companies have their life-blood, dollars, on the line.  The fact that their defense of choice is the MPN is a testament to its effectiveness.

More Fraud and Loathing in Buena Park

Some time ago I blogged about Sim Hoffman & Company, accused of committing vast amounts of fraud by billing for services never rendered to applicants and other schemes.

It appears that although Justice is coming, it is riding the California High Speed rail and thus taking its sweet time.

The case has been continued again, this time delaying the arraignment until January 6, 2012, according to adjuster.com

There are plenty of defendants out there who still have active liens from Advanced Professional Imaging and Better Sleeping Medical Center who need some sort of decision from the criminal fraud aspect of this case before they can decided whether they should pay or not.

In any case, dear readers, hopefully when Justice does deal with this case, it will be to the benefit of the workers’ compensation defense community.

As always, when I know more, so will you.

Do Not Pass Go, Do Not Collect $200

A recent article from BusinessInsurance.com covers an interesting case.

Normally I don’t post on unpublished opinions because, according to the California Rules of Court, unpublished opinions may not be cited.

The facts of this case are pretty straight forward: plaintiff worked for a construction company that was put to work on the company-boss’s house.  Applicant slipped and fell while at the house and wanted to sue his boss in civil court.  The Court of Appeal sent this one back to the workers’ compensation world.

I am well aware, as I’m sure many of my readers are, that defendants are regularly robbed in California’s Workers’ Compensation system.  Perhaps, if given the option, the defense community would be better off regaining its due process rights and duke these cases out in the civil arena.

That being said, I’m always surprised to see injured workers trying to climb out of the same lobster tank as us defendants.  After all, the workers’ compensation world is a workers’ paradise – why risk the dangers of the civil arena with its burdens of proof, concrete rules of evidence, and systemic accountability when you can have the presumption of compensation and applicant friendly environment of workers’ comp?

When both sides of the table are trying to jump ship – something is definitely wrong, both on the horizon and at the helm.

Michigan Timidly Tries to Curb California

Early on in my blogging career, I wrote about Florida’s efforts to curb California’s pillaging of orange groves and Dolphin teams with our very own section 5500.5.

I even had the distinct privilege of summarizing the workers’ compensation issues on Lockout Lowdown, an excellent sports law blog.

It appears that several states may follow Florida’s lead, among them Michigan, although clearly not as boldly and with a fraction of the effect.  A recent article reports that unsurprising support of the Detroit Lions for HB 5002, the Michigan workers’ compensation reform bill.

The bill locks visiting players out of Michigan’s workers’ compensation system if their state makes reciprocal arrangements for Michigan’s players.

In other words, the legislature in Michigan is telling the legislatures of other states: pass similar laws or we’ll loot your professional sports teams.

Here’s the problem with Michigan’s scheme: California doesn’t appear to care very much about its businesses, sports teams included, so the 49ers, the Giants, etc. are more of the human shield variety for Michigan and the like.  Also, no other state has as crippling generous workers’ compensation benefits as California, so more pillaging will be done from this state than from any other.

In any case, I salute Michigan for heading in the right direction – I don’t want non-Californians clogging up my venues with non-California cases because of a single game played in the Golden State.

As we watch the events unfold before us, dear readers, remember to keep calm and carry on.

The WCAB Wants Your Input!

Previously, your humble blogger had reported the decision of Messele v. Pitco Foods, where the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, in an en banc opinion, attempted to provide some clarity as to the proper timeline for using the panel qualified medical evaluator system.

You read the opinion.  You understood the opinion.  You were prepared to move on with your life.  Now there’s more.

The WCAB has issued another en banc opinion, in this one stating that “it was not [their] intention to throw into uncertainty the validity of QME panels previously obtained in ongoing workers’ compensation proceedings.”

While the decision currently stands, the WCAB has proposed making it apply prospectively only.  In other words, if the panel was issued outside of the proper timeline, and a party did not object before September 26, 2011, the panel stands.

In case you’re wondering, the WCAB would like to know what you think – you can submit written comments so long as they are received no later than November 19, 2011 by sending them to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, Office of the Commissioners, at either its street address (455 Golden Gate Avenue, 9th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102) or its Post Office Box address (P. O. Box 429459, San Francisco, California 94142-9459).

Shall all the past be revisited and re-litigated?  Or shall well simply continue down the yellow brick road as if the Medical Unit has done no wrong?  We can hopefully expect some finality on this issue in a month or two.

In the meantime, I suggest getting cozy and familiar with the procedures outlined by the WCAB – the rules allow the players who know them to control the PQME specialty and, very likely, the outcome of the case.

When your faithful blogger knows more, so will you.

Medical Unit Inches Towards Propriety

Bowing to the voluminous complains of countless workers’ compensation attorneys, as well as the en banc decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board in Messele v. Pitco Foods, Inc., the Department of Workers’ Compensation has set out new procedures for panel requests.

Before we play the Ewok celebration dance again, let’s recognize that this is a very limited fix in a very broken system.  The Medical Unit is not about to start following its own regulations or disowning its old unsigned, unofficial memorandum.  In accordance with the Messele opinion, the Medical Unit will only start rejecting pre-mature panel requests.

At least, that is the understanding from the latest DWC Newsline.

From what I can tell, the Medical Unit will continue to:

* Issue panels in a specialty other than that of the primary treating physician (chiropractors and pain specialists for everybody!)

* Issue a second panel to an applicant because he or she now represented (more chiropractors and pain specialists for everybody!)

*[Conceivably] Issue two panels in one case because of two requests (one from the defense, one from the applicant).

In other words, we will have to continue to be vigilant and aggressive, even if that means filing our DoRs in response to the Medical Unit’s errors.

In terms of the new procedures, the Medical Unit will reject premature panel requests.  [Please see my post on Messele, above, for a discussion of proper timing.]  The DWC also suggests including a proof of service with your letter proposing Agreed Medical Evaluators and mentioning, in the proposal letter, the subject of the dispute (for the Medical Unit’s future reference).

Unlicensed Contractors Nabbed in Sting

Recently, the Contractors State License Board’s Statewide Investigative Fraud Team performed a two-day sting operation, in which agents posed as homeowners and solicited bids. According to the CSLB’s press release, the result was over 100 people caught violating the law in various ways, including not carrying workers’ compensation insurance for their employees.

On the surface, this might appear relatively harmless, but it isn’t. Even though the injured employee could go after his uninsured employer, there lies an additional danger to the home-owner. Part of the requirement of being a licensed contractor in the state is having workers’ compensation insurance for your employees. When the contractor is underinsured or has obtained workers’ compensation insurance through fraud, he stops being a licensed contractor.

So the nice gentleman you hired to put his crew to work fixing your house is, suddenly and without your knowledge, your employee. And his employees have become your employees too. Now, in the unfortunate event of one of the workers sustaining an injury on the job, YOU are the uninsured, on-the-hook employer.

In other words, this isn’t some government annoyance like the shaking down of an “unlicensed” lemonade stand. This type of insurance fraud carries very serious and direct consequences for ordinary consumers, one which can not be spread around as a cost of doing business.

CWCI Releases List of New Legislation

Earlier, I blogged on the flurry of law-signing activity that happened at the Governor’s mansion.  I had intended to blog on most of the legislation, but the good folks at the California Workers’ Compensation Institute beat me to the punch.

CWCI has prepared a list of the workers’ compensation legislation signed into law recently.

A couple to keep an eye on in particular are Assembly Bill 335 which adjusts the language of benefits notices and Assembly Bill 1168, which would establish a fee schedule for vocational rehabilitation experts.

Honestly, even as a notorious cynic, I’m impressed – Sacramento could have done a lot worse.